جلالی، علیرضا، مظهری، محمد و مالدار، محمدحسن. (1403). ارزیابی کیفر حبس ابد در پرتو مادة 3 کنوانسیون اروپایی حقوق بشر. فصلنامه مطالعات حقوق عمومی دانشگاه تهران، 54(3)، 2055-2072.
حیدر قلی زاده،جعفر و ذاکر اردکانی، محمد. (1400). مطالعه تطبیقی حق بهرهمندی از بهداشت و سلامت در حقوق ایران، اسناد بینالمللی و رویه قضایی دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر. مطالعات حقوق بشر اسلامی، 10(2)، 79-100.
شفیعی،سامان. (1404). حق بر حریم خصوصی زندانیان و افراد محروم از آزادی با تأکید بر رویه دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر. (e225082). پژوهشهای حقوقی.
میری بالاجورشری،سیده مهشید و محمودی، امیررضا. (1403). واکاوی حقوق زندانیان با رویکردی بر نهادهای داخلی و بینالمللی. (e194345). فصلنامه تمدن حقوقی، 7(19).
Celiksoy, E. (2020). UK exceptionalism in the ECtHR’s jurisprudence on irreducible life sentences. International Journal of Human Rights, 24(11), 1594–1611.
Celiksoy, E. (2020). Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in prisoners' right to vote cases. Human Rights Law Review, 20(3), 555–577.
Cenda-Miedzińska, K. (2015). The protection of prisoners' health in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Internal Security, 7(1), 89–101.
Costa Neto, J. (2015). Rights as trumps and balancing: Reconciling the irreconcilable? Direito GV Law Review, 11, 159–182
Cowell, F. (2019). Understanding the causes and consequences of British exceptionalism towards the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Human Rights, 23(9), 1183–1202
Dickson, B. (2010). Positive obligations and the European Convention on Human Rights. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 61(3), 203–225
Dzehtsiarou, K. (2011). Does consensus matter? Legitimacy of European consensus in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Public Law, 2011, 534–557.
Føllesdal, A. (2009). The legitimacy of international human rights review: The case of the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(4), 595–610
Foster, S. (2010). Prison discipline, cellular confinement: Impartiality of proceedings—Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Coventry Law Journal, 15(2), 58–75.
Garland, D. (2018). Punishment and welfare revisited. Punishment & Society, 21(3), 267–290
Gerards, J. (2011). Pluralism, deference and the margin of appreciation doctrine. European Law Journal, 17(1), 80–98
Gerards, J. (2013). How to improve the necessity test of the European Court of Human Rights. International Constitutional Law Review, 11(4), 466–485
Gerards, J. (2015). The EctHR's response to fundamental rights issues related to financial and economic difficulties: The problem of compartmentalisation. Northern Quarterly Human Rights Review, 33, 274–291
Gerards, J. (2018). Margin of appreciation and incrementalism in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 18(3), 495–512
Gerards, J, & Senden, H. (2009). The structure of fundamental rights and the European court of Human Rights. International Journal of Constitutional Rights, 7, 619–635
Graham, L. (2018). From Vinter to Hutchinson and back again? The story of life imprisonment cases in the European Court of Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 3, 258–271.
Greer, S, & Wildhaber, L. (2012). Revisiting the debate about "constitutionalising" the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 12(4), 655–684.
Kratochvil, J. (2011). The inflation of the margin of appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights. Northern Ireland Quarterly Review, 29, 324–340
Kumm, M. (2010). The idea of Socratic contestation and the right to justification: The point of rights-based proportionality review. Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 4, 141–161
Lavi, S. (2011). Citizenship revocation as punishment: On the modern duties of citizens and their criminal breach. University of Toronto Law Journal, 61, 783–801
Londono, P. (2007). Applying convention jurisprudence to the needs of women prisoners. Public Law, 198, 198–213
Murphy, C. (2010). The principle of legality in criminal law under the European Convention on Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 2, 192–205.
legitimises international human rights tribunals. Hanse Law Review, 1, 47–66.
Petrova, E. (2018). Visiting and other family rights of prisoners and those kept in custody under the European Convention on Human Rights. Common Law Review, 15, 66–83.
Pettigrew, M. (2017). A Vinter retreat in Europe: Returning to the issue of whole life sentences in Strasbourg. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 8, 128–143.
Ploch, P. (2011). Why dignity matters: Dignity and the right (or not) to rehabilitation from international and national perspectives. NYU Journal of Law and Politics, 44, 887–909.
Popelier, P, & Van de Heyning, C. (2017). Subsidiarity post-Brighton: Procedural rationality as answer. Leiden Journal of International Law, 30(1), 5–28.
Robinson, G. (2008). Late-modern rehabilitation: The evolution of a penal strategy. Punishment & Society, 10(4), 429–446
Sadurski, W. (2009). Partnering with Strasbourg: Constitutionalization of the European Court of Human Rights, the accession of Central and Eastern European states to the Council of Europe, and the idea of pilot judgments. Human Rights Law Review, 9(3), 397–419.
Scheimann, L. (2008). Detainees, medical treatment and the European Convention on Human Rights. Coventry Law Journal, 13(1), 38–50.
Schrama, W. (2011). How to carry out interdisciplinary legal research: Some experiences with an interdisciplinary research method. Utrecht Law Review, 7, 147.
Spano, R. (2018). The future of the European Court of Human Rights: Subsidiarity, process-based review, and the rule of law. Human Rights Law Review, 18, 473.
Universality or diversity of human rights: Strasbourg in the age of subsidiarity. (2014).
Human Rights Law Review, 14, 487.
The rule of law as the lodestar of the European Convention on Human Rights: The Strasbourg Court and the independence of the judiciary. (2021). European Law Journal, 1.
Spielmann, D. (2012). Allowing the right margin: The European Court of Human Rights and the national margin of appreciation doctrine: Waiver or subsidiarity of European review? Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 14, 381.
Taneva, I. (2019). Why rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders are important from a Council of Europe perspective. US-China Law Review, 16, 258.
Tsakyrakis, S. (2009). Proportionality: An assault on human rights? International Constitutional Law, 7, 468.
Williams, S. (2020). Paupers behaving badly: Punishment in the Victorian workhouse. Journal of British Studies, 59, 764.
Willis, J. (2005). Transportation versus imprisonment in eighteenth and nineteenth-century Britain: Penal power, liberty, and the state. Law and Society Review, 39, 199.
Zysset, A. (2016). Searching for the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights: The neglected role of 'democratic society'. Global Constitutionalism, 5, 16.
Zysset, A. (2019). Freedom of expression, the right to vote, and proportionality at the European Court of Human Rights: An internal critique. International Constitutional Law, 17, 230.
